A- de 2018
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Carlos Libardo Bernal Pulido
✓Claimant Lix Mario Aristizabal Giraldo
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Condiciones formales y materiales
- Rechazar por impertinente
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se recusa al magistrado Alberto Rojas Ríos por la causal de tener interés en la decisión de que trata el artículo 25 del Decreto 2067 de 1991.
La Sala Plena constató que el ciudadano que presentó la recusación no participó como interviniente en el proceso de constitucionalidad de la referencia y que por tanto no tiene legitimación en la causa por activa.
Se RECHAZA por impertinente.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR, por impertinente, la recusacion presentada por el ciudadano Lix Mario Aristizabal Giraldo en contra del Magistrado Alberto Rojas Rios, dentro del asunto de la referencia.
- SEGUNDO. ORDENAR que se le informe al recusante que en contra de la presente decision no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.